Paul Richard Thomas
2018-08-12 15:30:20 UTC
I have cast around for a better way to fix this bug but have not come
up with anything. Although brute force, the patch does the job. The
testcase has been extended to include a MODULE PROCEDURE in a
submodule, which I think must have been the contributor's original
intention.
Bootstrapped and regtested on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
Paul
2017-08-12 Paul Thomas <***@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/86863
* resolve.c (resolve_typebound_call): If the TBP is not marked
as a subroutine, check the specific symbol.
2017-08-12 Paul Thomas <***@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/86863
* gfortran.dg/submodule_32.f08: New test.
up with anything. Although brute force, the patch does the job. The
testcase has been extended to include a MODULE PROCEDURE in a
submodule, which I think must have been the contributor's original
intention.
Bootstrapped and regtested on FC28/x86_64 - OK for trunk?
Paul
2017-08-12 Paul Thomas <***@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/86863
* resolve.c (resolve_typebound_call): If the TBP is not marked
as a subroutine, check the specific symbol.
2017-08-12 Paul Thomas <***@gcc.gnu.org>
PR fortran/86863
* gfortran.dg/submodule_32.f08: New test.